Skip to content.
Skip to navigation
Constructions
Search Site
Advanced Search…
Sections
News
SiteMap
Send this page to somebody
Fill in the email address of your friend to send an email with the address.
Address info
Send to
(Required)
The e-mail address to send this link to.
From
(Required)
Your email address.
Comment
A comment about this link.
Navigation
Home
Articles
The “bizarre” valency behaviour of Finnish verbs
Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint
The Spanish impersonal se-construction. Constructional variation and change
Storage as a way to grammaticalization
Special Volume 1: Constructions all over
A cognitive analysis of English cognate objects
Manner of Obtainment as a relative in a family of resultative constructions
Imperatives in concessive clauses: compatibility between constructions
Reviews
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Become an Author
Become a Reader
Letters to/from the Editors
FAQ
Imprint
Contents
1 Definitions and examples
2 Earlier attempts at explanation
2.1. Non-explanation
2.2. A ban on doubly filled slots
2.3. The constraint is inviolable and innate
2.4. A clash between positional alignment requirements
2.5. Markedness of person and case values
2.6. Harmonic association of person and role scales
2.7. Minimalist accounts in terms of feature checking
3 A usage-based explanation
3.1. Usage-grammar correspondences
3.2. The Frequency Condition on Grammaticalization
3.3. Further examples of grammaticalization processes
3.4. The explanation of the DPRC
4 The frequencies of pronoun combinations
5 Interim summary
6 Some extensions of the usage-based explanation
6.1. How important is frequency?
6.2. More harmonic association with Recipient and Theme
6.3. Generalizing the DPRC: The Ditransitive Topicality-Role Constraint
6.4. Weak, strong, and superstrong DPRC
6.5. The Monotransitive Person-Role Constraint
6.6. An analysis in terms of functional Optimality Theory and Harmonic Alignment
7 Conclusion
References
Abbreviations