Skip to content.
Skip to navigation
Constructions
Search Site
Advanced Search…
Sections
News
SiteMap
Send this page to somebody
Fill in the email address of your friend to send an email with the address.
Address info
Send to
(Required)
The e-mail address to send this link to.
From
(Required)
Your email address.
Comment
A comment about this link.
Navigation
Home
Articles
The “bizarre” valency behaviour of Finnish verbs
Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint
The Spanish impersonal se-construction. Constructional variation and change
Storage as a way to grammaticalization
Special Volume 1: Constructions all over
A cognitive analysis of English cognate objects
Manner of Obtainment as a relative in a family of resultative constructions
Imperatives in concessive clauses: compatibility between constructions
Reviews
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Become an Author
Become a Reader
Letters to/from the Editors
FAQ
Imprint
Contents
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Previous analyses
3. Theoretical assumptions
4. The varying syntactic characteristics of cognate objects
4.1. The modification of COs
4.2.
it
-Pronominalization
4.3. Passivization
4.4. Summary
5. Which verbs can take cognate objects and which verbs cannot
5.1. Three parameters
5.1.1. The force of energy of the subject
5.1.2. A change of state of the subject
5.1.3. The objectivity of the cognate noun
5.2. A classification of unergative verbs on the basis of the parameters
5.3. Unaccusative verbs that can appear in COCs
5.4. Unaccusative verbs that cannot appear in COCs
5.5. The association between verbs and construction
6. A cognitive account of the syntactic properties of COs
6.1. The modification of COs
6.2.
it
-Pronominalization
6.3. Passivization
6.4. Summary
7. Conclusion
References